I'm hoping that the following five guests will bring a nice balance to the table.
Thomas Bewick. I think it only right that I have one or two local naturalists along and I’ve chosen Thomas Bewick as one of them. As a youngster I don’t ever remember having been told about Thomas Bewick. Mind you I don’t remember being told much at school at all about the natural world (or those involved with it). I’m not so sure things have changed very much even today, although I do think young people are generally more aware of the environment. I do think Bewick led a fascinating life and I like his prints. I believe even to this day there are those in most fields who like to have control of information (and think they have a right to) and the science/natural history arena is as prone to this as any other. I believe very strongly that everyone is entitled to information and it should not be withheld unless there is a very good case to do so. What Bewick did with his prints was to perhaps for the first time, ensure that the wonders of nature were available to many more people in printed form. Until then it seems cost inhibited the majority owning such things and therefore sharing the available information. I get the impression that Bewick didn’t travel very much and have recently read that he didn’t even visit the Farne Islands and relied upon birds being sent to him from collectors.
Thomas Bewick. I think it only right that I have one or two local naturalists along and I’ve chosen Thomas Bewick as one of them. As a youngster I don’t ever remember having been told about Thomas Bewick. Mind you I don’t remember being told much at school at all about the natural world (or those involved with it). I’m not so sure things have changed very much even today, although I do think young people are generally more aware of the environment. I do think Bewick led a fascinating life and I like his prints. I believe even to this day there are those in most fields who like to have control of information (and think they have a right to) and the science/natural history arena is as prone to this as any other. I believe very strongly that everyone is entitled to information and it should not be withheld unless there is a very good case to do so. What Bewick did with his prints was to perhaps for the first time, ensure that the wonders of nature were available to many more people in printed form. Until then it seems cost inhibited the majority owning such things and therefore sharing the available information. I get the impression that Bewick didn’t travel very much and have recently read that he didn’t even visit the Farne Islands and relied upon birds being sent to him from collectors.
James Alder. James
Alder died in recent years and I often think of him as a modern day Thomas
Bewick. He’s the third member of the
dinner party that I have met and another local man. In his case, I’ve met him on a number of
occasions. James will certainly keep the
conversation going as I remember being with him on one occasion when for three
hours he told me of his life story. A
very good artist, James used to spend time as a youngster on the Tyne drawing/painting wildlife and local scenes having
been let out of school by a headmaster who had recognised his talent. A fascinating gentleman, who worked with
Royal Worchester Porcelain for some time as senior consultant sculptor of birds
and flowers. His conversation will be
varied and I know he was a good friend of Yehudi Menuhin the violinist. James introduced me through his TV
appearances to my favourite UK
bird species, the Dipper. I understand
that it was James Alder’s careful study of Dippers that showed that it was
often not the nictitating membrane of the bird’s eye that was seen flashing
across the eye, but instead it was actually the white feathering around the eye
which often confuses people. I know
James travelled quite a bit, but to me it is his careful studies of birds and
other wildlife, which may seem common to some, that I remember him most
for. That’s the type of birding I
advocate too. In his later years James
was commissioned by both Queen Elizabeth 11 and Queen Mother to produce books
of the Birds of Balmoral and Birds of the Castle of Mey. He also became President of the Natural
History Society of Northumbria.
John Kirk Townsend. I did think of inviting American artist James
Audubon along but to be honest what I have read about the guy makes me suspect
that at least some of his fame was built upon the backs of others, so instead
I’ve chosen a man closely associated with Audubon, and that is John Kirk
Townsend. Townsend was an enthusiastic
ornithologist. He was native to Philadelphia, but crossed the Rocky Mountains to the
Columbia River in 1834 and also made two visits to the Hawaiian
Islands. He found ne wspecies and no doubt saw species on on the Hawaiian Islands that today are extinct. He returned with a
massive collection of bird and mammal specimens which where used by James
Audubon in his preparation of Birds of America and Viviparous Quadrupeds. It would be good to hear from Townsend about
his experiences in North America at that time
in its development. The book John Kirk
Townsend written by Barbara and Richard Mearns describes wonderfully the
travels of Townsend and is much more than a book about birds.
Peter Scott. Son of Antarctic explorer Captain Robert
Falcon Scott, Peter Scott was amongst other things an artist, naturalist,
conservationist, broadcaster and writer.
I remember rather vaguely from childhood a TV programme that Peter Scott
presented. I’m trying to recall the name
of it. Was it called ‘Look?’
Yes it was, and low and behold some
film clips can be seen here http://www.wildfilmhistory.org/film/79/Foxes.html
Perhaps best known now for founding the
Wildfowl and Wetland Trust, he was also Founder Chairman of the World Wildlife
Fund. I remember as a youngster looking
at prints of Peter Scott’s paintings of geese, never thinking that I would see
such things. I’m pleased to say since
then I have on many occasions and have visited Islay (an area which Peter Scott
said was the best place in Europe to watch
geese) to watch Barnacle and White Fronted Geese. As a young man Peter Scott was a wildfowler
until he decided that it was better to shoot with a camera and paint and
conserve wildfowl. Of course he won’t be
the only person at dinner that frequently used a gun!
Alexander von Humbolt. Thirty years before Charles Darwin, Alexander
von Humbolt travelled in South America on one
of the greatest scientific expeditions of the nineteenth century. Darwin
held the man in great esteem. The trip
included the first scientific exploration of the Amazon by Europeans. Now I must admit to not knowing too much
about Alexander von Humbolt but I’m going to make the effort to find out a lot
more about him. It’ll certainly be good
to discuss with him his travels in South America
during which he mapped out much of the area.
I think there will be a few at diner who wish to thank him!
So if I have added up correctly that is my ten guests. I’m sure you have noted, not a twitcher amongst them! Sadly I have had to miss many off the invite
list. Three who nearly made it were
Joseph Banks, Georg Steller and Jacque Cousteau. I’ll have to see how this dinner goes and
maybe have another at a later date.
Now I’ve decided to add just one more person to the list. Yes I know I said no one else could come, but
I’m making an exception.
Samuel Hood. Yes it’s my trusted naturalist friend
Sam. Not quite as experienced and
esteemed as the other guests as yet, but there is nothing to say he won’t be in
years to come. Anyway I’m sure the other
guests, being the people they are, would find it a great privilege to pass on
their experiences to a young naturalist and also to look at some of his
photographic images after dinner. I know
Sam will be more than able to hold his own in the conversation around the
table. So you’re in Sam and if the
others don’t turn up we will go birding instead.